{
  "id": 4150737,
  "name": "JACINDA BURTON, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF MICHAEL C. BURTON v. PHOENIX FABRICATORS AND ERECTORS, INC. AND DAVIS, MARTIN, POWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.; DONNA DAVIS, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF CHARLES M. DAVIS v. PHOENIX FABRICATORS AND ERECTORS, INC. AND DAVIS, MARTIN, POWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Burton v. Phoenix Fabricators & Erectors, Inc.",
  "decision_date": "2008-04-10",
  "docket_number": "No. 447P07",
  "first_page": "352",
  "last_page": "352",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "362 N.C. 352"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 74,
    "char_count": 804,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.687,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.2011472650805044e-07,
      "percentile": 0.5936844194391256
    },
    "sha256": "d037dc88057b76dbd18bd39961875bec386a6009807603530986bd475806f6e2",
    "simhash": "1:0ddb2eb602413df1",
    "word_count": 126
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:47:03.529976+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Hudson, J. For the Court"
    ],
    "parties": [
      "JACINDA BURTON, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF MICHAEL C. BURTON v. PHOENIX FABRICATORS AND ERECTORS, INC. AND DAVIS, MARTIN, POWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC. DONNA DAVIS, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF CHARLES M. DAVIS v. PHOENIX FABRICATORS AND ERECTORS, INC. AND DAVIS, MARTIN, POWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "ORDER\nFinding that the order of the trial court denying defendant\u2019s motion to dismiss affects a substantial right and will work injury if not corrected before final judgment, we allow defendant\u2019s Petition for Discretionary Review for the sole purpose of remanding the matter to the Court of Appeals for consideration of the merits. Defendant\u2019s Alternative Petition for Writ of Certiorari is denied.\nBy Order of the Court in Conference, this 10th day of April, 2008.\nHudson, J. For the Court",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "JACINDA BURTON, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF MICHAEL C. BURTON v. PHOENIX FABRICATORS AND ERECTORS, INC. AND DAVIS, MARTIN, POWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC. DONNA DAVIS, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF CHARLES M. DAVIS v. PHOENIX FABRICATORS AND ERECTORS, INC. AND DAVIS, MARTIN, POWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.\nNo. 447P07"
  },
  "file_name": "0352-01",
  "first_page_order": 430,
  "last_page_order": 430
}