{
  "id": 4149246,
  "name": "ZORAIDA WILLIAMS, Employee v. LAW COMPANIES GROUP, INC., Employer, ZURICH, Carrier",
  "name_abbreviation": "Williams v. Law Companies Group, Inc.",
  "decision_date": "2008-10-10",
  "docket_number": "No. 52A08",
  "first_page": "506",
  "last_page": "506",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "362 N.C. 506"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "654 S.E.2d 725",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "case_ids": [
        12640070
      ],
      "year": 2008,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/se2d/654/0725-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "188 N.C. App. 235",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        4155344
      ],
      "year": 2008,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/188/0235-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 112,
    "char_count": 1075,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.732,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.1347530300029075
    },
    "sha256": "301d73f38bbc68d31d09b3025508a7b56a5d23761553768b7d916e1a3dbbf86d",
    "simhash": "1:ac7b77cf2da31974",
    "word_count": 170
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:47:03.529976+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Justice Hudson did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "ZORAIDA WILLIAMS, Employee v. LAW COMPANIES GROUP, INC., Employer, ZURICH, Carrier"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nFor the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed. This case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further remand to the Industrial Commission to make findings of fact regarding whether plaintiffs current disability was caused by the 21 September 2000 accident without consideration of the broken rod in plaintiffs femur. '\nREVERSED AND REMANDED.\nJustice Hudson did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Scudder & Hedrick, PLLC, by Samuel A. Scudder, for plaintiff-appellant.",
      "Lewis & Roberts, P.L.L.G., by Richard M. Lewis and Paul C. McCoy, for defendant-appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "ZORAIDA WILLIAMS, Employee v. LAW COMPANIES GROUP, INC., Employer, ZURICH, Carrier\nNo. 52A08\n(Filed 10 October 2008)\nAppeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 188 N.C. App. 235, 654 S.E.2d 725 (2008), reversing and remanding an opinion and award entered by the North Carolina Industrial Commission on 19 July 2006. Heard in the Supreme Court 10 September 2008.\nScudder & Hedrick, PLLC, by Samuel A. Scudder, for plaintiff-appellant.\nLewis & Roberts, P.L.L.G., by Richard M. Lewis and Paul C. McCoy, for defendant-appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0506-01",
  "first_page_order": 584,
  "last_page_order": 584
}