{
  "id": 4149929,
  "name": "C. WAYNE CRAWFORD and LYNN P. CRAWFORD v. COLON S. MINTZ, JR., WILLIAM R. OWENS, and BFD PROPERTIES, INC. d/b/a RE/MAX PROPERTY ASSOCIATES",
  "name_abbreviation": "Crawford v. Mintz",
  "decision_date": "2008-12-12",
  "docket_number": "No. 47A08",
  "first_page": "666",
  "last_page": "667",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "362 N.C. 666"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "653 S.E.2d 222",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "case_ids": [
        12639906
      ],
      "year": 2007,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/se2d/653/0222-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "187 N.C. App. 378",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8374229
      ],
      "year": 2007,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/187/0378-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 169,
    "char_count": 1875,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.721,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 6.497341544922815e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3997808366433719
    },
    "sha256": "aa6b1046164a1544a31c509589edd12aead19333436941ee627bf18a8523b4a2",
    "simhash": "1:087336a9366fd4d8",
    "word_count": 290
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:47:03.529976+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "C. WAYNE CRAWFORD and LYNN P. CRAWFORD v. COLON S. MINTZ, JR., WILLIAM R. OWENS, and BFD PROPERTIES, INC. d/b/a RE/MAX PROPERTY ASSOCIATES"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nFor the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed. This case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for consideration of the remaining assignments of error. Plaintiffs\u2019 petition for discretionary review as to additional issues was improvidently allowed.\nREVERSED AND REMANDED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Everett, Gaskins, Hancock & Stevens, LLP, by E.D. Gaskins, Jr. and Michael J. Tadych, for plaintiff-appellants.",
      "McDaniel & Anderson, L.L.P., by John M. Kirby, for defendant appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "C. WAYNE CRAWFORD and LYNN P. CRAWFORD v. COLON S. MINTZ, JR., WILLIAM R. OWENS, and BFD PROPERTIES, INC. d/b/a RE/MAX PROPERTY ASSOCIATES\nNo. 47A08\n(Filed 12 December 2008)\nFraud\u2014 negligent misrepresentation \u2014 misinformation in MLS listing \u2014 justifiable reliance\nThe decision of the Court of Appeals that the trial court erred by denying defendant real estate brokers\u2019 motion for a directed verdict on plaintiff buyers\u2019 claim for negligent misrepresentation arising from defendants\u2019 incorrect statement on the sellers\u2019 MLS listing that the house was served by a city sewer system when it in fact had a septic system is reversed for the reason stated in the dissenting opinion that, although the buyers saw this misinformation on a printout that omitted the language \u201cInformation deemed reliable but not guaranteed,\u201d the trial court properly submitted the issue of justifiable reliance to the jury.\nAppeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 187 N.C. App. 378, 653 S.E.2d 222 (2007), reversing an order and judgment entered on 11 May 2006 by Judge James R. Fullwood in District Court, Wake County. On 11 June 2008, the Supreme Court allowed plaintiffs\u2019 petition for discretionary review of additional issues. Heard in the Supreme Court 19 November 2008.\nEverett, Gaskins, Hancock & Stevens, LLP, by E.D. Gaskins, Jr. and Michael J. Tadych, for plaintiff-appellants.\nMcDaniel & Anderson, L.L.P., by John M. Kirby, for defendant appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0666-01",
  "first_page_order": 744,
  "last_page_order": 745
}