{
  "id": 4150659,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. MARIO LLAMAS-HERNANDEZ",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Llamas-Hernandez",
  "decision_date": "2009-02-06",
  "docket_number": "No. 220A08",
  "first_page": "8",
  "last_page": "8",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "363 N.C. 8"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "659 S.E.2d 79",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "case_ids": [
        12640827
      ],
      "year": 2008,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/se2d/659/0079-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "189 N.C. App. 640",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        4156165
      ],
      "year": 2008,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/189/0640-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 117,
    "char_count": 1170,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.695,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 3.2266121157557446e-07,
      "percentile": 0.8674405341778614
    },
    "sha256": "0633990958ac9970b264aa6776caf19c844af429d51e695397e8c0b58c770916",
    "simhash": "1:496dd0aa6183844b",
    "word_count": 191
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:19:39.869638+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. MARIO LLAMAS-HERNANDEZ"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nFor the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed.\nREVERSED.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by LaToya B. Powell, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.",
      "Kevin P. Tally, Public Defender, by Julie Ramseur Lewis, Assistant Public Defender, for defendant-appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. MARIO LLAMAS-HERNANDEZ\nNo. 220A08\n(Filed 6 February 2009)\nEvidence\u2014 lay opinion testimony \u2014 substance was cocaine\nThe decision of the Court of Appeals finding no error in defendant\u2019s trial and conviction of trafficking in cocaine by possession of 28 grams or more but less than 200 grams is reversed for the reason stated in the dissenting opinion that the trial court erred by allowing two detectives to express lay opinions that a white powder substance found in an apartment leased by defendant was cocaine.\nAppeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 189 N.C. App. 640, 659 S.E.2d 79 (2008), finding no error in a judgment entered 14 September 2006 by Judge W. Robert Bell in Superior Court, Mecklenburg County. Heard in the Supreme Court 18 November 2008.\nRoy Cooper, Attorney General, by LaToya B. Powell, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.\nKevin P. Tally, Public Defender, by Julie Ramseur Lewis, Assistant Public Defender, for defendant-appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0008-01",
  "first_page_order": 46,
  "last_page_order": 46
}