{
  "id": 4150755,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JAMES DAVID SIZEMORE",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Sizemore",
  "decision_date": "2009-08-27",
  "docket_number": "No. 402PA08",
  "first_page": "578",
  "last_page": "578",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "363 N.C. 578"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "129 S. Ct. 2527",
      "category": "reporters:federal",
      "reporter": "S. Ct.",
      "case_ids": [
        3657952
      ],
      "year": 2009,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/us/557/0305-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 79,
    "char_count": 750,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.752,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.13488933138572945
    },
    "sha256": "36b24cd71274eb389d7827e491f05dbeb105ba75fbf75c09db7ef54bf4b0fa5a",
    "simhash": "1:36298ff64b0c24cb",
    "word_count": 117
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:19:39.869638+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JAMES DAVID SIZEMORE"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "ORDER\nThe Court allows defendant\u2019s petition for discretionary review for the limited purpose of remanding to the Court of Appeals, for reconsideration in light of the United States Supreme Court\u2019s decision if Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts, 557 U.S. -, 129 S. Ct. 2527, \u2014 L. Ed. - (2009), defendant\u2019s issue Number 3:\n(3) Whether the trial court violated the defendant\u2019s Confrontation Clause rights by admitting testimonial evidence where the defendant had not had a prior opportunity to cross examine the witness.\nDefendant\u2019s petition for discretionary review as to the remaining issues is denied.\nBy order of the Court in Conference, this 27th day of August 2009.\nHudson, J.\nFor the Court",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Hudson, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JAMES DAVID SIZEMORE\nNo. 402PA08"
  },
  "file_name": "0578-01",
  "first_page_order": 616,
  "last_page_order": 616
}