{
  "id": 4150828,
  "name": "BRYAN TATE HELMS v. ANGELIQUE LANDRY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Helms v. Landry",
  "decision_date": "2009-12-11",
  "docket_number": "No. 55A09",
  "first_page": "738",
  "last_page": "738",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "363 N.C. 738"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "671 S.E.2d 347",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "case_ids": [
        12642495
      ],
      "year": 2009,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/se2d/671/0347-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 111,
    "char_count": 1278,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.691,
    "sha256": "c6a3a1c7151291ecdc942808d6d6f2fcb45117a78d1444234620732c626088e6",
    "simhash": "1:495cb6bf2233f29b",
    "word_count": 208
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:19:39.869638+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "BRYAN TATE HELMS v. ANGELIQUE LANDRY"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nFor the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed.\nREVERSED.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Thurman, Wilson & Boutwell, PA., by John D. Boutwell, for plaintiff-appellee/appellant.",
      "Angelique Landry, pro se, defendant-appellant/appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "BRYAN TATE HELMS v. ANGELIQUE LANDRY\nNo. 55A09\n(Filed 11 December 2009)\nPaternity \u2014 motion for paternity test \u2014 prior order establishing paternity \u2014 absence of appeal or Rule 60(b) motion\nA decision of the Court of Appeals that the mother of a child born out of wedlock was entitled to a paternity test after custody was changed from the mother to the purported biological father was reversed for the reasons stated in the dissenting Court of Appeals opinion that the father\u2019s paternity was established in a prior court order and the mother failed to appeal that order in a timely manner and failed to seek relief from that order pursuant . to Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b).\nAppeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 194 N.C. App.-, 671 S.E.2d 347 (2009), reversing an order entered. 13 September 2007 by Judge Christy T. Mann in District Court, Mecklenburg County, and remanding for further proceedings. Heard in the Supreme Court on 17 November 2009.\nThurman, Wilson & Boutwell, PA., by John D. Boutwell, for plaintiff-appellee/appellant.\nAngelique Landry, pro se, defendant-appellant/appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0738-01",
  "first_page_order": 776,
  "last_page_order": 776
}