{
  "id": 4153701,
  "name": "DONALD C. McCASKILL, Petitioner v. DEPARTMENT OF STATE TREASURER, RETIREMENT SYSTEMS DIVISION, Respondent",
  "name_abbreviation": "McCaskill v. Department of State Treasurer, Retirement Systems Division",
  "decision_date": "2011-03-11",
  "docket_number": "No. 292A10",
  "first_page": "69",
  "last_page": "69",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "365 N.C. 69"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "695 S.E.2d 108",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 2010,
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 138,
    "char_count": 1363,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.743,
    "sha256": "f9d6ba31c3435486f9fd9f6e58f9a36e4d2b31ba713801b7319014200a25cab2",
    "simhash": "1:1cb13b727e43ed5a",
    "word_count": 210
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:57:15.030367+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Justice JACKSON took no part in the consideration or decision of this case."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "DONALD C. McCASKILL, Petitioner v. DEPARTMENT OF STATE TREASURER, RETIREMENT SYSTEMS DIVISION, Respondent"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nAs to the issues before us on appeal of right, because the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services lacked authority to sign the settlement agreement binding the State Retirement System, the executory portions of the agreement are unenforceable. Accordingly, the parties to the agreement are otherwise restored to the positions they held as of 3 July 2002. As to the additional issue, we determine that discretionary review was improvidently allowed.\nAFFIRMED IN PART; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.\nJustice JACKSON took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Stark Law Group, PLLG, by Thomas H. Stark and Seth A. \u25a0Neyhart, for petitioner-appellant.",
      "Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Robert M. Curran, Special Deputy Attorney General, for respondent-appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "DONALD C. McCASKILL, Petitioner v. DEPARTMENT OF STATE TREASURER, RETIREMENT SYSTEMS DIVISION, Respondent\nNo. 292A10\n(Filed 11 March 2011)\nAppeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals,-N.C. App. \u2014, 695 S.E.2d 108 (2010), affirming an order entered on 23 February 2009 by Judge Orlando F. Hudson, Jr. in Superior Court, Durham County. On 7 October 2010, the Supreme Court allowed petitioner\u2019s petition for discretionary review of additional issues. Heard in the Supreme Court 11 January 2011.\nStark Law Group, PLLG, by Thomas H. Stark and Seth A. \u25a0Neyhart, for petitioner-appellant.\nRoy Cooper, Attorney General, by Robert M. Curran, Special Deputy Attorney General, for respondent-appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0069-01",
  "first_page_order": 107,
  "last_page_order": 107
}