{
  "id": 4153883,
  "name": "IN THE MATTER OF: M.I.W.",
  "name_abbreviation": "In re M.I.W.",
  "decision_date": "2011-06-15",
  "docket_number": "No. 148P11",
  "first_page": "186",
  "last_page": "186",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "365 N.C. 186"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 50,
    "char_count": 410,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.73,
    "sha256": "2f2194c75269d74d0069a468fe52631019f2d1923db10d0e772df87d9bccbc47",
    "simhash": "1:2c821cbf044b8708",
    "word_count": 69
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:57:15.030367+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "IN THE MATTER OF: M.I.W."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "ORDER\nThe respondent-mother\u2019s petition for writ of certiorari is allowed on the following issue only:\nDid the trial court possess subject matter jurisdiction to terminate parental rights when the motion in the cause was filed during the pendency of an appeal?\nBy order of the Court in Conference, this 15th day of June, 2011.\ns/Jackson, J.\nFor the Court",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "s/Jackson, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "IN THE MATTER OF: M.I.W.\nNo. 148P11\nFrom Harnett County"
  },
  "file_name": "0186-01",
  "first_page_order": 224,
  "last_page_order": 224
}