{
  "id": 4153505,
  "name": "LATRECIA TREADWAY v. SUSANNA KRAMMER DIEZ; GENE LUMMUS; GENE LUMMUS HARLEY DAVIDSON, INC.; MIKE CALLOWAY, individually and officially; JOHN DOE, individually and officially; COUNTY OF BUNCOMBE; and BUNCOMBE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT",
  "name_abbreviation": "Treadway v. Diez",
  "decision_date": "2011-10-07",
  "docket_number": "No. 52A11",
  "first_page": "288",
  "last_page": "288",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "365 N.C. 288"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "703 S.E.2d 832",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 2011,
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 121,
    "char_count": 1375,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.734,
    "sha256": "79501d4cf94df65e5b0c7410ed1933d1f3205b9af79e5ab94f80365a5cc3b4a4",
    "simhash": "1:285a14aea647d49c",
    "word_count": 209
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:57:15.030367+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Justice JACKSON did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "LATRECIA TREADWAY v. SUSANNA KRAMMER DIEZ; GENE LUMMUS; GENE LUMMUS HARLEY DAVIDSON, INC.; MIKE CALLOWAY, individually and officially; JOHN DOE, individually and officially; COUNTY OF BUNCOMBE; and BUNCOMBE COUNTY SHERIFF\u2019S DEPARTMENT"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nWe reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion. Further, we conclude that the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues was improvidently allowed. This case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further remand to the trial court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.\nREVERSED AND REMANDED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.\nJustice JACKSON did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Hyler & Lopez, P.A., by Robert J. Lopez, for plaintiff-appellee.",
      "Doughton & Hart PLLC, by Thomas J. Doughton and Amy L. Rich, for defendant-appellant Buncombe County Sheriff\u2019s Department."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "LATRECIA TREADWAY v. SUSANNA KRAMMER DIEZ; GENE LUMMUS; GENE LUMMUS HARLEY DAVIDSON, INC.; MIKE CALLOWAY, individually and officially; JOHN DOE, individually and officially; COUNTY OF BUNCOMBE; and BUNCOMBE COUNTY SHERIFF\u2019S DEPARTMENT\nNo. 52A11\n(Filed 7 October 2011)\nAppeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals,-N.C. App.-, 703 S.E.2d 832 (2011), affirming an order entered on 8 October 2009 by Judge Bradley B. Letts in Superior Court, Buncombe County. On 10 March 2011, the Supreme Court allowed defendant\u2019s petition for discretionary review of additional issues. Heard in the Supreme Court 8 September 2011.\nHyler & Lopez, P.A., by Robert J. Lopez, for plaintiff-appellee.\nDoughton & Hart PLLC, by Thomas J. Doughton and Amy L. Rich, for defendant-appellant Buncombe County Sheriff\u2019s Department."
  },
  "file_name": "0288-01",
  "first_page_order": 326,
  "last_page_order": 326
}