{
  "id": 4154073,
  "name": "IN THE MATTER OF DISTRICT COURT ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER",
  "name_abbreviation": "In re District Court Administrative Order",
  "decision_date": "2012-01-26",
  "docket_number": "No. 216PA11",
  "first_page": "417",
  "last_page": "417",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "365 N.C. 417"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "405 S.E.2d 125",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1991,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "132-33",
          "parenthetical": "footnote and internal citations omitted"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "329 N.C. 84",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        2553368
      ],
      "year": 1991,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "99-100",
          "parenthetical": "footnote and internal citations omitted"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/329/0084-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 149,
    "char_count": 1567,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.755,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.13518066111190266
    },
    "sha256": "c9de2a30a5282aea904fb48db56abb8a5cf83b8e4620f4673bc2b0056400ac9c",
    "simhash": "1:26d5c962350b0d62",
    "word_count": 251
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:57:15.030367+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "PARKER, C.J., MARTIN, J. and TIMMONS-GOODSON, J. recused."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "IN THE MATTER OF DISTRICT COURT ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "ORDER\nOn writ of certiorari pursuant to N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-32(b) to review an administrative order entered on 15 April 2011 by Judge Jerry A. Jolly in District Court, Brunswick County. Heard in the Supreme Court 10 January 2012.\nThe order of the District Court is vacated in each and every respect. As this Court has noted:\nEven in the name of its inherent power, the judiciary may not arrogate a duty reserved by the constitution exclusively to another body, nor may it violate the constitutional rights of persons brought before its tribunals. Furthermore, doing what is \u201creasonably necessary for the proper administration of justice\u201d means doing no more than is reasonably necessary. The court\u2019s exercise of its inherent power must be responsible \u2014 even cautious \u2014 and in the \u201cspirit of mutual cooperation\u201d among the three branches.\n\u201cThe very genius of our tripartite Government is based upon the proper exercise of their respective powers together with harmonious cooperation between the three independent Branches.\u201d\n329 N.C. 84, 99-100, 405 S.E.2d 125, 132-33 (1991) (footnote and internal citations omitted); see also N.C. Const. art. IV, \u00a7 10 (setting forth the responsibilities and duties of the District Courts); N.C. Const, art. IV, \u00a7 18 (setting forth the responsibilities and duties of the District Attorney).\nBy order of the Court in Conference, this 26th day of January, 2012.\nPARKER, C.J., MARTIN, J. and TIMMONS-GOODSON, J. recused.\ns/Jackson. J.\nFor the Court",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "s/Jackson. J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "IN THE MATTER OF DISTRICT COURT ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER\nNo. 216PA11\n(Filed 27 January 2012)\nORDER"
  },
  "file_name": "0417-01",
  "first_page_order": 455,
  "last_page_order": 455
}