{
  "id": 4349920,
  "name": "DAVIS REX MAULDIN, Employee v. AC CORPORATION, Employer, ARGONAUT INSURANCE, PMA INSURANCE, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE, THE NORTH CAROLINA INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION, Carriers",
  "name_abbreviation": "Mauldin v. AC Corp.",
  "decision_date": "2012-06-14",
  "docket_number": "No. 539A11",
  "first_page": "140",
  "last_page": "141",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "366 N.C. 140"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "719 S.E.2d 110",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 2011,
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 134,
    "char_count": 1520,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.719,
    "sha256": "660b8bebf11f117def030d10bb3e3fd0a2b2d9b1278da17383b3e4e92ecd435c",
    "simhash": "1:3815e4ff30b340da",
    "word_count": 233
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:35:25.873086+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "DAVIS REX MAULDIN, Employee v. AC CORPORATION, Employer, ARGONAUT INSURANCE, PMA INSURANCE, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE, THE NORTH CAROLINA INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION, Carriers"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nFor the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed as to the appealable issue of right, that is, whether the Industrial Commission properly found and concluded that Argonaut was the carrier on the risk for plaintiffs asbestosis. The remaining issues addressed by the Court of Appeals axe not pxoperly befoxe this Court and the Court of Appeals\u2019 decision as to these matters remains undisturbed. This case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further remand to the North Carolina Industrial commission for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.\nREVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Wallace and Graham, P.A., by Edward L. Pauley, for plaintiff - appellee.",
      "Hedrick, Gardner, Kincheloe & Garofalo, L.L.P, M. Duane Jones, for defendant-appellants AC Corporation and PMA Insurance.",
      "McAngus, Goudelock & Courie, P.L.L.C., by Charles D. Cheney and Daniel L. McCullough, for defendant-appellee Argonaut Insurance."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "DAVIS REX MAULDIN, Employee v. AC CORPORATION, Employer, ARGONAUT INSURANCE, PMA INSURANCE, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE, THE NORTH CAROLINA INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION, Carriers\nNo. 539A11\n(Filed 14 June 2012)\nAppeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, \u2022\u2014 N.C. App.-, 719 S.E.2d 110 (2011), affirming in part and reversing and remanding in part an opinion and award filed on 28 September 2010 by the North Carolina Industrial Commission. Heard in the Supreme Court on 17 April 2012.\nWallace and Graham, P.A., by Edward L. Pauley, for plaintiff - appellee.\nHedrick, Gardner, Kincheloe & Garofalo, L.L.P, M. Duane Jones, for defendant-appellants AC Corporation and PMA Insurance.\nMcAngus, Goudelock & Courie, P.L.L.C., by Charles D. Cheney and Daniel L. McCullough, for defendant-appellee Argonaut Insurance."
  },
  "file_name": "0140-01",
  "first_page_order": 172,
  "last_page_order": 173
}