{
  "id": 4349542,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. CHAD JARRETT BARROW",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Barrow",
  "decision_date": "2012-06-14",
  "docket_number": "No. 505A11",
  "first_page": "141",
  "last_page": "141",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "366 N.C. 141"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "718 S.E.2d 673",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 2011,
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 111,
    "char_count": 1100,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.729,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.527646540942415e-08,
      "percentile": 0.34861742904702164
    },
    "sha256": "3e48970c7d87aa39b37ea1d39deba20a8e4536c70d860b80a04d2ddcaac0acdc",
    "simhash": "1:1438958840112fd2",
    "word_count": 165
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:35:25.873086+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. CHAD JARRETT BARROW"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nAs to the issue on direct appeal, we affirm. Discretionary review was improvidently allowed as to the other issues.\nAFFIRMED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Melissa L. Trippe, Special Deputy Attorney General, for the State-appellee/appellant.",
      "Staples S. Hughes, Appellate Defender, by Daniel Shatz, Assistant Appellate Defender, for defendant-appellant/appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. CHAD JARRETT BARROW\nNo. 505A11\n(Filed 14 June 2012)\nAppeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals,-N.C. App.-, 718 S.E.2d 673 (2011), finding no error in defendant\u2019s conviction that resulted in a judgment entered on 7 December 2009 by Judge Nathaniel J. Poovey in Superior Court, Cleveland County, but reversing in part and remanding for further sentencing proceedings. On 26 January 2012, the Supreme Court allowed both the State\u2019s petition for discretionary review and defendant\u2019s conditional petition for discretionary review as to an additional issue. Heard in the Supreme Court on 8 May 2012.\nRoy Cooper, Attorney General, by Melissa L. Trippe, Special Deputy Attorney General, for the State-appellee/appellant.\nStaples S. Hughes, Appellate Defender, by Daniel Shatz, Assistant Appellate Defender, for defendant-appellant/appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0141-01",
  "first_page_order": 173,
  "last_page_order": 173
}