{
  "id": 4346803,
  "name": "State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, as Subrogee of Ronald Thompson v. Arthur Hill",
  "name_abbreviation": "State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Hill",
  "decision_date": "2012-06-13",
  "docket_number": "209P12",
  "first_page": "226",
  "last_page": "226",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "366 N.C. 226"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 48,
    "char_count": 524,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.625,
    "sha256": "ba0e4baac1bbf2a8d9ecce3bdd05e699ec3e919d2d8efa44a3fca8753f8c69aa",
    "simhash": "1:20d308956661b118",
    "word_count": 95
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:35:25.873086+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, as Subrogee of Ronald Thompson v. Arthur Hill"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "1. Def\u2019s Pro Se PDR Under N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-31 (COAU-1125)\n2. Def\u2019s Pro Se Motion to Suspend Rules and Consider PDR Timely Filed\n3. Def\u2019s Pro Se Motion in the Alternative to Consider PDR a Petition for Writ, of Mandamus\n4. Def\u2019s Pro Se Motion in the Alternative to Consider PDR a Petition for Writ of Prohibition\n5. Def\u2019s Pro Se Motion in the Alternative to Consider PDR a PWC\n1. Denied\n2. Denied\n3. Denied\n1. Denied\n5. Denied",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "209P12\nState Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, as Subrogee of Ronald Thompson v. Arthur Hill"
  },
  "file_name": "0226-01",
  "first_page_order": 258,
  "last_page_order": 258
}