{
  "id": 4355091,
  "name": "WALTER SUTTON BAYSDEN v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA",
  "name_abbreviation": "Baysden v. State",
  "decision_date": "2013-01-25",
  "docket_number": "No. 522A11",
  "first_page": "370",
  "last_page": "370",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "366 N.C. 370"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "718 S.E.2d 699",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 2011,
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "217 N.C. App. 20",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        4348146
      ],
      "year": 2011,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/217/0020-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "639 S.E.2d 443",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "case_ids": [
        12637521,
        12637522
      ],
      "year": 2007,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/se2d/639/0443-01",
        "/se2d/639/0443-02"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "569 S.E.2d 647",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 2002,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "356 N.C. 292",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        1511245
      ],
      "year": 2002,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/356/0292-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "361 N.C. 215",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        3737083
      ],
      "year": 2007,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/361/0215-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "700 S.E.2d 223",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 2010,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "364 N.C. 416",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        4152505
      ],
      "year": 2010,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/364/0416-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 141,
    "char_count": 1301,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.746,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.12982294956584e-08,
      "percentile": 0.323046054036355
    },
    "sha256": "38999f95203947ce4df8d285bfb4fa09249a70a9558d2d601421f8b66ec87fae",
    "simhash": "1:2891f45e2625c45d",
    "word_count": 213
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:35:25.873086+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "WALTER SUTTON BAYSDEN v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "\u25a0 PER CURIAM.\nJustice BEASLEY took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court .are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See, e.g., Goldston v. State, 364 N.C. 416, 700 S.E.2d 223 (2010); Formyduval v. Britt, 361 N.C. 215, 639 S.E.2d 443 (2007); Pitts v. Am. Sec. Ins. Co., 356 N.C. 292, 569 S.E.2d 647 (2002).\nAFFIRMED.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "\u25a0 PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "DanL. Hardway Law Office, by Dan L. Hardway, for plaintiff - appellee/appellant.",
      "Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by John J. Aldridge, III, Special Deputy Attorney General, for defendant-appellant/appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "WALTER SUTTON BAYSDEN v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA\nNo. 522A11\n(Filed 25 January 2013)\nAppeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 217 N.C. App. 20, 718 S.E.2d 699 (2011), reversing a judgment entered on 11 February 2011 by Judge Lucy N. Inman in Superior Court, Wake County, and remanding for entry of summary judgment in favor of plaintiff. On 26 January 2012, the Supreme Court allowed plaintiffs petition for discretionary review. Heard in the Supreme Court on 8 May 2012.\nDanL. Hardway Law Office, by Dan L. Hardway, for plaintiff - appellee/appellant.\nRoy Cooper, Attorney General, by John J. Aldridge, III, Special Deputy Attorney General, for defendant-appellant/appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0370-01",
  "first_page_order": 402,
  "last_page_order": 402
}