{
  "id": 4351846,
  "name": "INLAND HARBOR HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. v. ST. JOSEPHS MARINA, LLC, RENAISSANCE HOLDINGS, LLC, ST JOSEPHS PARTNERS, LLC DEWITT REAL ESTATE SERVICES, INC., DENNIS BARBOUR, RANDY GAINEY, THOMAS A. SAIEED, JR., TODD A. SAIEED, ROBERT D. JONES, and THE NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL RESOURCES COMMISSION v. LATARA DESHEA HURST",
  "name_abbreviation": "Inland Harbor Homeowners Ass'n v. St. Josephs Marina, LLC",
  "decision_date": "2012-12-12",
  "docket_number": "No. 156PA12-2",
  "first_page": "376",
  "last_page": "376",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "366 N.C. 376"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 119,
    "char_count": 1263,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.737,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 6.087085966315723e-08,
      "percentile": 0.38022467719160463
    },
    "sha256": "700d133d9f9f11ba43f3c96dd848bb2f0ad6c23247165f23f87de76b479efc39",
    "simhash": "1:b3b1c4db0da8b5dd",
    "word_count": 190
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:35:25.873086+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "INLAND HARBOR HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. v. ST. JOSEPHS MARINA, LLC, RENAISSANCE HOLDINGS, LLC, ST JOSEPHS PARTNERS, LLC DEWITT REAL ESTATE SERVICES, INC., DENNIS BARBOUR, RANDY GAINEY, THOMAS A. SAIEED, JR., TODD A. SAIEED, ROBERT D. JONES, and THE NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL RESOURCES COMMISSION v. LATARA DESHEA HURST"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "ORDER\nIt appearing that the Court of Appeals has not addressed the issue, briefed by plaintiff and defendants on appeal, of whether:\nThe Trial Court erred in denying appellant\u2019s [plaintiff\u2019s] motion for summary judgment on appellant\u2019s claim for judicial reformation of the deed, and in granting appellee\u2019s motion on the same issue;\nAnd it further appearing that in its PDR, plaintiff has restated the issue (Issue 3) to be briefed as follows:\nWhether genuine issues of material fact exist precluding summary judgment for Appellee-Respondents on Plaintiff-Petitioner\u2019s . . . deed reformation claim.\nPlaintiff\u2019s Petition for Discretionary Review is ALLOWED for the limited purpose of remanding to that court to address the issue. Defendant\u2019s Conditional Petition for Discretionary Review is DISMISSED as moot.\ns/Hudson, J.\nFor the Court",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "s/Hudson, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "INLAND HARBOR HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. v. ST. JOSEPHS MARINA, LLC, RENAISSANCE HOLDINGS, LLC, ST JOSEPHS PARTNERS, LLC DEWITT REAL ESTATE SERVICES, INC., DENNIS BARBOUR, RANDY GAINEY, THOMAS A. SAIEED, JR., TODD A. SAIEED, ROBERT D. JONES, and THE NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL RESOURCES COMMISSION v. LATARA DESHEA HURST\nFrom New Hanover County\nNo. 156PA12-2\nBy order of this Court in Conference, this 12th day of December, 2012."
  },
  "file_name": "0376-01",
  "first_page_order": 408,
  "last_page_order": 408
}