{
  "id": 4352170,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. RODERICK TYNELL RICHARDSON",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Richardson",
  "decision_date": "2012-12-12",
  "docket_number": "No. 402A12",
  "first_page": "377",
  "last_page": "377",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "366 N.C. 377"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "726 S.E.2d 168",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 2012,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "366 N.C. 100",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        4359080
      ],
      "year": 2012,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/366/0100-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 72,
    "char_count": 1040,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.763,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.1481235006365236
    },
    "sha256": "33ed7d8f3744e6cfeb98a9c3ee38ee96aa3da46fc04febcba0fba54019ef972c",
    "simhash": "1:a0199f7a0731eebd",
    "word_count": 179
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:35:25.873086+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. RODERICK TYNELL RICHARDSON"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "ORDER\nUpon consideration of the Notice of Appeal Based Upon a Constitutional Question filed by defendant on the 21st day of September 2012, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:\n\u201cThe Court allows the Defendant\u2019s Notice of Appeal for the limited purpose of remanding to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of our decision in State v. Moore, 366 N.C. 100, 726 S.E.2d 168 (2012). By order of the Court in conference, this the 12th day of December 2012.\u201d\nUpon consideration of the Motion by the State of North Carolina to Dismiss Defendant\u2019s Notice of Appeal filed on the 3rd day of October 2012, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:\n\u201cDismissed as Moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 12th day of December 2012.\u201d\ns/Jackson. J.\nFor the Court",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "s/Jackson. J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. RODERICK TYNELL RICHARDSON\nFrom Mecklenburg County\nNo. 402A12\nBy order of the Court in Conference, this 12th day of December 2012."
  },
  "file_name": "0377-01",
  "first_page_order": 409,
  "last_page_order": 409
}