{
  "id": 4361398,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. ROBIN EUGENE LAND",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Land",
  "decision_date": "2013-01-24",
  "docket_number": "No. 510A12",
  "first_page": "383",
  "last_page": "383",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "366 N.C. 383"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 55,
    "char_count": 469,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.77,
    "sha256": "94edec1fe7aae3296fd412fefaad17b413afab09469f56babc326e2eccb7bd01",
    "simhash": "1:946b8ce18f8268cb",
    "word_count": 78
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:35:25.873086+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. ROBIN EUGENE LAND"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "ORDER\nThe defendant\u2019s petition for discretionary review as to additional issues in this matter is allowed only as to the following issue: whether the Court of Appeals imposed a standard of review that is inconsistent with the standard set out in Strickland v. Washington. The remaining issues are denied.\ns/Beaslev. J.\nFor the Court",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "s/Beaslev. J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. ROBIN EUGENE LAND\nFrom Mecklenburg County\nNo. 510A12\nBy Order of this Court, this 24th day of January, 2013."
  },
  "file_name": "0383-01",
  "first_page_order": 415,
  "last_page_order": 415
}