{
  "id": 4350745,
  "name": "State v. Kevin Martel Laney",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Laney",
  "decision_date": "2013-01-24",
  "docket_number": "228P12",
  "first_page": "426",
  "last_page": "426",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "366 N.C. 426"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 42,
    "char_count": 394,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.718,
    "sha256": "49dbd058f5b3e82d5a9f1c5663264ad9f8b32f9e064519f9dbd301523181dcdb",
    "simhash": "1:b24f87151cddf412",
    "word_count": 68
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:35:25.873086+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "State v. Kevin Martel Laney"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "1. Def\u2019s NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA11-1173)\n2. Def\u2019s PDR Under N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-31\n3. State\u2019s Motion to Dismiss Appeal\n4. State\u2019s Conditional PDR Under N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-31\n5. Def\u2019s Motion to Amend NOA and PDR\n6. Def\u2019s Second Motion to Amend NOA and PDR\n1. - - -\n2. Denied\n3. Allowed\n. Dismissed as Moot\n5. Allowed\n6. Allowed\nBeasley, J., Recused",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "228P12\nState v. Kevin Martel Laney"
  },
  "file_name": "0426-02",
  "first_page_order": 458,
  "last_page_order": 458
}
