{
  "id": 4360048,
  "name": "Anthony Williams v. James J. Exum-Attorney",
  "name_abbreviation": "Williams v. Exum",
  "decision_date": "2013-01-24",
  "docket_number": "448P12-2",
  "first_page": "431",
  "last_page": "431",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "366 N.C. 431"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 20,
    "char_count": 122,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.755,
    "sha256": "07eb44b9368169e5df8b817562844a6cf5d6ad39d0f539c5aebfd74738b5e558",
    "simhash": "1:93df039390b9e1dd",
    "word_count": 21
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:35:25.873086+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Anthony Williams v. James J. Exum-Attorney"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pit\u2019s Pro Se Motion for N.C. Rule of App. P. Rule 60 Relief\nDismissed",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "448P12-2\nAnthony Williams v. James J. Exum-Attorney"
  },
  "file_name": "0431-06",
  "first_page_order": 463,
  "last_page_order": 463
}