{
  "id": 4356825,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. TAWARA McDANIEL BEAN",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Bean",
  "decision_date": "2013-03-07",
  "docket_number": "No. 37P13",
  "first_page": "552",
  "last_page": "552",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "366 N.C. 552"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "359 N.C. 644",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        3801139
      ],
      "year": 2005,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/359/0644-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "723 S.E.2d 326",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 2012,
      "opinion_index": 0
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 79,
    "char_count": 828,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.747,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.14842969609425105
    },
    "sha256": "9bd267bc5ebf799b8590d718d6ffa37e10f3f1274b0473c97a781fd4ae25bcc1",
    "simhash": "1:343916aa2e5be8af",
    "word_count": 135
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:35:25.873086+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Beasley, J., Recused."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. TAWARA McDANIEL BEAN"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "ORDER\nUpon consideration of the Petition for Discretionary Review filed by plaintiff on the 18th day of January 2013, the Court allows Defendant\u2019s Petition for Discretionary Review for the limited purpose of remanding to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration. Upon reconsideration, the Court of Appeals should review the instruction and evidentiary issues for plain error in light of our decision in State v. Lawrence, \u2014 N.C. \u2014, 723 S.E.2d 326 (2012), and the Rules of Appellate Procedure, Rule 10(a)(4); and the court should review the closing argument issue for gross impropriety in light of State v. Campbell, 359 N.C. 644 (2005).\nBeasley, J., Recused.\ns/Jackson. J.\nFor the Court",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "s/Jackson. J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. TAWARA McDANIEL BEAN\nRANDOLPH COUNTY\nNo. 37P13\nBy Order of this Court in Conference, this 7th day of March, 2013."
  },
  "file_name": "0552-01",
  "first_page_order": 584,
  "last_page_order": 584
}