{
  "id": 4350703,
  "name": "State v. Frederick Karl Taft. Jr. and Fernandez Kabrer Taft",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Taft",
  "decision_date": "2013-06-12",
  "docket_number": "145P13",
  "first_page": "594",
  "last_page": "594",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "366 N.C. 594"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 40,
    "char_count": 454,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.682,
    "sha256": "8265e1b74143caeafcf4b3af6e417315ae3d0cfaa0cdc351c6b98751ac501cfc",
    "simhash": "1:3036db17032cf0b2",
    "word_count": 71
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:35:25.873086+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "State v. Frederick Karl Taft. Jr. and Fernandez Kabrer Taft"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "1. Defendant Fernandez Kabrer Taft NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA12-646)\n2. Defendant Fernandez Kabrer Taft\u2019s PDR Under N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-31\n3. Defendant Frederick Karl Taft., Jr.\u2019s NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question\n4. Defendant Frederick Karl Taft, Jr.\u2019s PDR Under N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-31\n5. State\u2019s Motion to Dismiss Both Appeals\n1. ---\n2. Denied\n3.---\n4. Denied\n5. Allowed",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "145P13\nState v. Frederick Karl Taft. Jr. and Fernandez Kabrer Taft"
  },
  "file_name": "0594-01",
  "first_page_order": 626,
  "last_page_order": 626
}