{
  "id": 4315482,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. DAVID FRANKLIN HURT",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Hurt",
  "decision_date": "2013-06-27",
  "docket_number": "No. 505PA10",
  "first_page": "80",
  "last_page": "80",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "367 N.C. 80"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "702 S.E.2d 82",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 2010,
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "208 N.C. App. 1",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        4180388
      ],
      "year": 2010,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/208/0001-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 111,
    "char_count": 1206,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.725,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.14552778945799544
    },
    "sha256": "7a237d5b8d960adcc821ef6d7f4e6d2d2f27594269dcff62ce62d5efb674f7ad",
    "simhash": "1:8b330a7faa2305ff",
    "word_count": 186
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:06:46.212757+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Justice BEASLEY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. DAVID FRANKLIN HURT"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nFor the reasons stated in State v. Ortiz-Zape,_N.C._,_, _ S.E.2d_,_(2013), the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed. The case is remanded for consideration of the remaining issues on appeal.\nREVERSED AND REMANDED.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      },
      {
        "text": "Chief Justice PARKER and Justice HUDSON\ndissent for the reasons stated in Justice Hudson\u2019s dissenting opinions in State v. Ortiz-Zape, _N.C. _, _ S.E.2d_ (2013) (329PA11) and State v. Brewington,__N.C._,_S.E.2d_(2013) (235PA10).\nJustice BEASLEY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.",
        "type": "dissent",
        "author": "Chief Justice PARKER and Justice HUDSON"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Daniel P O\u2019Brien, Assistant Attorney General, for the State-appellant.",
      "Staples S. Hughes, Appellate Defender, by Barbara S. Blackman, Assistant Appellate Defender, for defendant-appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. DAVID FRANKLIN HURT\nNo. 505PA10\n(Filed 27 June 2013)\nOn discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-31 of a unanimous decision of the Court of Appeals, 208 N.C. App. 1, 702 S.E.2d 82 (2010), finding prejudicial error in a judgment entered on 4 April 2008 by Judge Thomas D. Haigwood in Superior Court, Caldwell County, and remanding for a new sentencing trial. Heard in the Supreme Court on 12 February 2013.\nRoy Cooper, Attorney General, by Daniel P O\u2019Brien, Assistant Attorney General, for the State-appellant.\nStaples S. Hughes, Appellate Defender, by Barbara S. Blackman, Assistant Appellate Defender, for defendant-appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0080-01",
  "first_page_order": 120,
  "last_page_order": 120
}