{
  "id": 4331748,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. MALIK SHAHEEM FRANKLIN",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Franklin",
  "decision_date": "2013-12-20",
  "docket_number": "No. 36A13",
  "first_page": "183",
  "last_page": "183",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "367 N.C. 183"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "736 S.E.2d 218",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 2012,
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "700 S.E.2d 223",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 2010,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "364 N.C. 416",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        4152505
      ],
      "year": 2010,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/364/0416-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "716 S.E.2d 849",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 2011,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "365 N.C. 305",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        4154104
      ],
      "year": 2011,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/365/0305-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 128,
    "char_count": 1167,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.742,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.207966869300525e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3279697001639864
    },
    "sha256": "4c85b05d9d4974a701317d4a727f0614e126ac6bbca417c80dc5c6dc6edbe8e6",
    "simhash": "1:090ff1a60361ccdd",
    "word_count": 190
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:06:46.212757+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. MALIK SHAHEEM FRANKLIN"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nJustice BEASLEY took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See, e.g., Amward Homes, Inc. v. Town of Cary, 365 N.C. 305, 716 S.E.2d 849 (2011); Goldston v. State, 364 N.C. 416, 700 S.E.2d 223 (2010).\nAFFIRMED.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.",
      "Staples S. Hughes, Appellate Defender, by Andrew J. DeSimone, Assistant Appellate Defender, for defendant-appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. MALIK SHAHEEM FRANKLIN\nNo. 36A13\n(Filed 20 December 2013)\nAppeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals,_N.C. App._, 736 S.E.2d 218 (2012), affirming an order denying defendant\u2019s motion to suppress which resulted in a judgment entered on 8 November 2011 by Judge Hugh B. Lewis in Superior Court, Mecklenburg County. Heard in the Supreme Court on 4 September 2013.\nRoy Cooper, Attorney General, by Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.\nStaples S. Hughes, Appellate Defender, by Andrew J. DeSimone, Assistant Appellate Defender, for defendant-appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0183-01",
  "first_page_order": 223,
  "last_page_order": 223
}