{
  "id": 4313997,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. HAROLD DEAN SMITH, JR.",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Smith",
  "decision_date": "2013-12-18",
  "docket_number": "No. 198P13",
  "first_page": "208",
  "last_page": "208",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "367 N.C. 208"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 46,
    "char_count": 374,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.75,
    "sha256": "02e8af9282bdba3f29e00f3240cc6dc12eadc178a449fd6587055e8b4ec2c785",
    "simhash": "1:4d119c27267bb4e1",
    "word_count": 66
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:06:46.212757+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. HAROLD DEAN SMITH, JR."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "ORDER\nThe State\u2019s Petition for Writ of Certiorari is allowed for the limited purpose of remanding to the Court of Appeals for review of the trial court\u2019s order following full briefing by the parties.\ns/ Beaslev. J.\nFor the Court",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "s/ Beaslev. J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. HAROLD DEAN SMITH, JR.\nCraven County\nNo. 198P13\nBy order of the Court in Conference, this 18th day of December, 2013."
  },
  "file_name": "0208-01",
  "first_page_order": 248,
  "last_page_order": 248
}