{
  "id": 4324683,
  "name": "The North Carolina State Bar v. Robert J. Burford, Attorney",
  "name_abbreviation": "North Carolina State Bar v. Burford",
  "decision_date": "2013-08-27",
  "docket_number": "184P13",
  "first_page": "217",
  "last_page": "217",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "367 N.C. 217"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 41,
    "char_count": 330,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.643,
    "sha256": "8213711d9c5d14a6fce3ce34a754a1ba0a13b8485f6fb781dc4173723546b564",
    "simhash": "1:88f431179ecc8000",
    "word_count": 60
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:06:46.212757+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Martin, J. and Beasley, J., Recused"
    ],
    "parties": [
      "The North Carolina State Bar v. Robert J. Burford, Attorney"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "1. Def\u2019s Pro Se and Attorney NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA12909)\n2. Def\u2019s Pro Se and Attorney PDR Under N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-31\n3. Def\u2019s Pro Se Motion to Amend NOA and PDR\n1. Dismissed Ex Mero Motu\n2. Denied\n3. Denied\nMartin, J. and Beasley, J., Recused",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "184P13\nThe North Carolina State Bar v. Robert J. Burford, Attorney"
  },
  "file_name": "0217-01",
  "first_page_order": 257,
  "last_page_order": 257
}