{
  "id": 4319457,
  "name": "State v. James Lamont Hazel",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Hazel",
  "decision_date": "2013-08-27",
  "docket_number": "204P13",
  "first_page": "219",
  "last_page": "219",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "367 N.C. 219"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 35,
    "char_count": 272,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.739,
    "sha256": "bdfcad7fc7dfdee571fcb978299dff53e88b16fcf0ae0cd23fb4831e6ac7ba48",
    "simhash": "1:3a2d59145ae86213",
    "word_count": 47
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:06:46.212757+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "State v. James Lamont Hazel"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "1. Defs NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA12-1102)\n2. Defs PDR Under N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-31\n3. State\u2019s Motion to Dismiss Appeal\n4. State\u2019s Motion to Deem Response to NOA and PDR Timely Served\n1. - --\n2. Denied\n3. Allowed\n4. Allowed",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "204P13\nState v. James Lamont Hazel"
  },
  "file_name": "0219-01",
  "first_page_order": 259,
  "last_page_order": 259
}