{
  "id": 4322913,
  "name": "State v. Ronald Edward McCray",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. McCray",
  "decision_date": "2013-08-27",
  "docket_number": "289P13",
  "first_page": "226",
  "last_page": "226",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "367 N.C. 226"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 35,
    "char_count": 249,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.674,
    "sha256": "a629192ba152eb721d3b1bb6d9c80fd90b31596d659e71c8bf66ca1fd0510e4f",
    "simhash": "1:42b83116f2b9e804",
    "word_count": 45
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:06:46.212757+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "State v. Ronald Edward McCray"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "1. Def\u2019s Pro Se NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA12-1309)\n2. Def\u2019s Pro Se Motion to Appoint Counsel\n3. Def\u2019s Pro Se PDR Under N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-31\n1. Dismissed Ex Mero Motu\n2. Dismissed as Moot\n3. Denied",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "289P13\nState v. Ronald Edward McCray"
  },
  "file_name": "0226-03",
  "first_page_order": 266,
  "last_page_order": 266
}