{
  "id": 4330409,
  "name": "State v. Daniel Peterson",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Peterson",
  "decision_date": "2013-08-27",
  "docket_number": "491A93-4",
  "first_page": "233",
  "last_page": "233",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "367 N.C. 233"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 33,
    "char_count": 246,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.73,
    "sha256": "20d8572c911076b85eaa9c47284373afb04b0aa2de66f4e9819da35a0f71b57d",
    "simhash": "1:bff2f99cea20f517",
    "word_count": 45
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:06:46.212757+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "State v. Daniel Peterson"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "1. Def\u2019s Pro Se PWC to Review the Order of Cumberland County Superior Court\n2. Def\u2019s Pro Se Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis\n3. Def\u2019s Pro Se Motion to Appoint Counsel\n1. Denied\n2. Allowed\n3. Dismissed as Moot",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "491A93-4\nState v. Daniel Peterson"
  },
  "file_name": "0233-03",
  "first_page_order": 273,
  "last_page_order": 273
}