{
  "id": 4313182,
  "name": "Calvin and Sandra Latimer v. Internal Revenue Service",
  "name_abbreviation": "Latimer v. Internal Revenue Service",
  "decision_date": "2013-11-07",
  "docket_number": "439P13",
  "first_page": "264",
  "last_page": "264",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "367 N.C. 264"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 32,
    "char_count": 293,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.664,
    "sha256": "a1c61efb2ca6eea11e6f014d6161f96472f48aa68dcd21306bc2ee47856d6515",
    "simhash": "1:3ef316dc46f1a7dd",
    "word_count": 48
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:06:46.212757+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Calvin and Sandra Latimer v. Internal Revenue Service"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "1. Pit\u2019s Pro Se Motion for Complaint of Unauthorized Collection\n2. Pit\u2019s Pro Se Motion to Revisit Mandate and Evidence\n3. Pit\u2019s Pro Se Motion for Sanctions on I.R.S. Collection While in Review\n1. Dismissed\n2. Dismissed\n3. Dismissed",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "439P13\nCalvin and Sandra Latimer v. Internal Revenue Service"
  },
  "file_name": "0264-01",
  "first_page_order": 304,
  "last_page_order": 304
}