{
  "id": 4330243,
  "name": "IN THE MATTER OF: D.C.",
  "name_abbreviation": "In re D.C.",
  "decision_date": "2014-06-11",
  "docket_number": "No. 523P13",
  "first_page": "489",
  "last_page": "489",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "367 N.C. 489"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 43,
    "char_count": 366,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.765,
    "sha256": "e4d4a6a6b7aef79e529211a87d03bb8b0957dc451b4f637c486583f62e405277",
    "simhash": "1:38391cbd2f29f58b",
    "word_count": 63
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:06:46.212757+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "IN THE MATTER OF: D.C."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "ORDER\nPetitioner\u2019s Petition for Discretionary Review is allowed for the limited purpose of remanding to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of our decision in In re L.M.T., No. 40PA13 (20 December 2013).\ns/Beaslev. J.\nFor the Court",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "s/Beaslev. J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "IN THE MATTER OF: D.C.\nFrom Chatham County\nNo. 523P13\nBy order of the Court in Conference, this 11th day of June, 2014."
  },
  "file_name": "0489-01",
  "first_page_order": 529,
  "last_page_order": 529
}