{
  "id": 4315635,
  "name": "IN THE MATTER OF: R.R.N.",
  "name_abbreviation": "In re R.R.N.",
  "decision_date": "2014-08-19",
  "docket_number": "No. 186P14",
  "first_page": "490",
  "last_page": "490",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "367 N.C. 490"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 55,
    "char_count": 536,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.76,
    "sha256": "06a0d20d8a3da689568659ec327719fb157b41dcc05ae3a10d014118fac795bc",
    "simhash": "1:349cf9f1d4c121fb",
    "word_count": 85
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:06:46.212757+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "IN THE MATTER OF: R.R.N."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "ORDER\nPetitioner\u2019s petition for discretionary review is allowed as to the following issue: \u201cWhether the Court of Appeals erred in its interpretation of N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7B-101(3) regarding the definition of a \u2018caretaker.\u2019 \u201d Respondent\u2019s motion to dismiss is denied, petitioner\u2019s motion for leave to file verification is allowed, and petitioner\u2019s petition for writ of supersedeas is allowed.\ns/Beaslev, J.\nFor the Court",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "s/Beaslev, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "IN THE MATTER OF: R.R.N.\nFrom Wilson County\nNo. 186P14\nBy order of the Court in Conference, this 19th day of August, 2014."
  },
  "file_name": "0490-01",
  "first_page_order": 530,
  "last_page_order": 530
}