{
  "id": 4318561,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. EUGENE OLIVER DENNING",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Denning",
  "decision_date": "2014-08-19",
  "docket_number": "No. 135P14",
  "first_page": "491",
  "last_page": "491",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "367 N.C. 491"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 56,
    "char_count": 597,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.794,
    "sha256": "1440f36bf13adfbaf1b2f08bfc6aa1a12edb9c5071f9109e0d1342941174e5c3",
    "simhash": "1:007e74e5f1ddccf9",
    "word_count": 100
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:06:46.212757+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Jackson, J., recused."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. EUGENE OLIVER DENNING"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "ORDER\nThe Petition for Discretionary Review filed by defendant is treated as a Petition for Writ of Certiorari and is DENIED. Defendant\u2019s motion to deem his Petition for Discretionary Review timely is DENIED. In addition, defendant\u2019s motion in the alternative for this Court to issue its Writ of Certiorari to review his Petition for Discretionary Review in spite of it not being timely filed is DENIED.\nJackson, J., recused.\ns/Beaslev. J.\nFor the Court",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "s/Beaslev. J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. EUGENE OLIVER DENNING\nWAKE COUNTY\nNo. 135P14\nBy order of the Court in Conference, this the 19th day of August 2014."
  },
  "file_name": "0491-01",
  "first_page_order": 531,
  "last_page_order": 531
}