{
  "id": 4330092,
  "name": "RIGGINGS HOMEOWNERS, INC., Petitioner v. COASTAL RESOURCES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Respondent",
  "name_abbreviation": "Riggings Homeowners, Inc. v. Coastal Resources Commission",
  "decision_date": "2014-12-19",
  "docket_number": "No. 401A13",
  "first_page": "643",
  "last_page": "643",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "367 N.C. 643"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "747 S.E.2d 301",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 2013,
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "716 S.E.2d 849",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 2011,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "365 N.C. 305",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        4154104
      ],
      "year": 2011,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/365/0305-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 140,
    "char_count": 1366,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.724,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.14641162477040168
    },
    "sha256": "768e3674bb6c2b13928c59f065c32a5a6e1e47967111c1a6e64c3b63d9b73b52",
    "simhash": "1:089d75a22665c5d9",
    "word_count": 210
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:06:46.212757+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "RIGGINGS HOMEOWNERS, INC., Petitioner v. COASTAL RESOURCES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Respondent"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nJustice HUNTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See, e.g., Amward Homes, Inc. v. Town of Cary, 365 N.C. 305, 716 S.E.2d 849 (2011).\nAFFIRMED.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Shipman & Wright, L.L.P., by William G. Wright and Gary K. Shipman, for petitioner-appellant/appellee.",
      "Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Christine A. Goebel, Assistant Attorney General, and Mary L. Lucasse and Marc Bernstein, Special Deputy Attorneys General, for resp\u00f3ndentappellant/appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "RIGGINGS HOMEOWNERS, INC., Petitioner v. COASTAL RESOURCES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Respondent\nNo. 401A13\n(Filed 19 December 2014)\nAppeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals,_N.C. App._, 747 S.E.2d 301 (2013), affirming an order entered on 1 June 2012 by Judge Jay D. Hockenbury in Superior Court, New Hanover County. On 23 January 2014, the Supreme Court allowed respondent\u2019s petition for discretionary review of additional issues and petitioner\u2019s conditional petition for discretionary review. Heard in the Supreme Court on 6 October 2014.\nShipman & Wright, L.L.P., by William G. Wright and Gary K. Shipman, for petitioner-appellant/appellee.\nRoy Cooper, Attorney General, by Christine A. Goebel, Assistant Attorney General, and Mary L. Lucasse and Marc Bernstein, Special Deputy Attorneys General, for resp\u00f3ndentappellant/appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0643-01",
  "first_page_order": 683,
  "last_page_order": 683
}