{
  "id": 12202019,
  "name": "State v. William Earl Askew",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Askew",
  "decision_date": "2015-08-21",
  "docket_number": "133P15",
  "first_page": "282",
  "last_page": "282",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "368 N.C. 282"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 37,
    "char_count": 259,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.62,
    "sha256": "6d47d75c57d7134ee67d5d1bf28d1d49cd41f62a777a59cbb063f85305443e4b",
    "simhash": "1:82b129144ae1a990",
    "word_count": 47
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:54:29.404016+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "State v. William Earl Askew"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "1. Def\u2019s Pro Se Notice of Appeal Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA14-411)\n1. Dismissed ex mero motu\n2. Def\u2019s Pro Se PDR Under N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-31\n2. Denied\n3. Def\u2019s Pro Se Motion to Appoint Counsel\n3. Dismissed as moot",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "133P15\nState v. William Earl Askew"
  },
  "file_name": "0282-08",
  "first_page_order": 432,
  "last_page_order": 432
}