{
  "id": 12204716,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JUAN CARLOS BENITEZ",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Benitez",
  "decision_date": "2015-09-24",
  "docket_number": "No. 24PA15",
  "first_page": "350",
  "last_page": "350",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "368 N.C. 350"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "499 S.E.2d 761",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1998,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "parenthetical": "remanding a motion for appropriate relief to the trial court with instructions to conduct an evidentiary hearing"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "348 N.C. 254",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        1659696
      ],
      "year": 1998,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "parenthetical": "remanding a motion for appropriate relief to the trial court with instructions to conduct an evidentiary hearing"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/348/0254-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 131,
    "char_count": 1426,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.701,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 7.871964132982943e-08,
      "percentile": 0.4596573004835417
    },
    "sha256": "c2a625325d3deee981c8f3d11808159fe62102469b5af6eb55070f759967f449",
    "simhash": "1:7c7d2416624326f0",
    "word_count": 240
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:54:29.404016+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JUAN CARLOS BENITEZ"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "ORDER\nThis case has come before the Court by way of the State\u2019s Petition for Discretionary Review pursuant to N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-31.\nPursuant to N.C.G.S. \u00a7 15A-1418, the decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated and this Court now ORDERS this case remanded to the Court of Appeals for remand to the Superior Court, Lee County, for an evidentiary hearing to make findings of fact necessary to determine whether the trial counsel\u2019s actions fell below an objective standard of reasonableness, see State v. McHone, 348 N.C. 254, 499 S.E.2d 761 (1998) (remanding a motion for appropriate relief to the trial court with instructions to conduct an evidentiary hearing), and, if so, whether defendant was prejudiced by any deficient performance by his trial counsel.\nThe time periods for perfecting or proceeding with the appeal are tolled. The Superior Court, Lee County, is ordered to transmit its order on the motion for appropriate relief within 120 days so that the Court of Appeals may proceed with the appeal or enter an order terminating the appeal, as appropriate.\nBy order of the Court in Conference, this 24th day of September, 2015.\ns/Ervin. J.\nFor the Court\nWITNESS my hand and the seal of the Supreme Court of North Carolina, this the 24th day of September, 2015.\nCHRISTIE S. CAMERON ROEDER Clerk of the Supreme Court\ns/M.C. Hackney Assistant Clerk",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "s/Ervin. J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JUAN CARLOS BENITEZ\nFrom Lee County\nNo. 24PA15"
  },
  "file_name": "0350-01",
  "first_page_order": 500,
  "last_page_order": 500
}