{
  "id": 12205473,
  "name": "Joseph Michael Griffith v. Chaplain Hovis, et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Griffith v. Hovis",
  "decision_date": "2015-09-24",
  "docket_number": "257A15",
  "first_page": "356",
  "last_page": "356",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "368 N.C. 356"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 41,
    "char_count": 295,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.676,
    "sha256": "6f370359c2c53cecf03f58ec1fce5a11960de54504d63bb08806ec84fe278c1b",
    "simhash": "1:36e2769f0ab6b441",
    "word_count": 50
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:54:29.404016+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Joseph Michael Griffith v. Chaplain Hovis, et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "1. Pit\u2019s Pro Se Notice of Appeal Based \u00fcpon a Constitutional Question (COA14-1411)\n1.-\n2. Pit\u2019s Pro Se Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis\n2. Allowed\n3. Defs\u2019 Motion to Dismiss the Appeal\n3. Allowed\nJackson, J.,\nrecused",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Jackson, J.,"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "24 September 2015\n257A15\nJoseph Michael Griffith v. Chaplain Hovis, et al."
  },
  "file_name": "0356-01",
  "first_page_order": 506,
  "last_page_order": 506
}