{
  "id": 12205953,
  "name": "Charles Alonzo Tunstall-Bey v. Frank W. Ballance, et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Tunstall-Bey v. Ballance",
  "decision_date": "2015-09-24",
  "docket_number": "323A92-10",
  "first_page": "359",
  "last_page": "359",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "368 N.C. 359"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 40,
    "char_count": 320,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.67,
    "sha256": "4b4f0d75f872e22da4c4c7e4cf006f20df1e0fad6badceba58cdac2a77d8f3b9",
    "simhash": "1:6fd3dadd3ecd549d",
    "word_count": 54
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:54:29.404016+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Charles Alonzo Tunstall-Bey v. Frank W. Ballance, et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "1. Petitioner\u2019s Pro Se Petition for Writ of Certiorari to Review Order of the COA\n1. Dismissed\n2. Petitioner\u2019s Pro Se Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis\n2. Allowed\n3. Petitioner\u2019s Pro Se Motion to Appoint Counsel\n3. Dismissed as moot",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "24 September 2015\n323A92-10\nCharles Alonzo Tunstall-Bey v. Frank W. Ballance, et al."
  },
  "file_name": "0359-01",
  "first_page_order": 509,
  "last_page_order": 509
}