{
  "id": 12210282,
  "name": "State v. Quincy Lamar Hill",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Hill",
  "decision_date": "2016-01-28",
  "docket_number": "150P15-2",
  "first_page": "681",
  "last_page": "681",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "368 N.C. 681"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 16,
    "char_count": 102,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.646,
    "sha256": "0f7a3df02102e4081578a6b8f45610a5763b8f7e81c2b27a52d9cc9bcc0aad0c",
    "simhash": "1:80a220474f9ae314",
    "word_count": 16
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:54:29.404016+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "State v. Quincy Lamar Hill"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Def\u2019s Pro Se Motion for Re-Hearing\nDismissed\nBeasley, J.,\nrecused",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Beasley, J.,"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "150P15-2\nState v. Quincy Lamar Hill"
  },
  "file_name": "0681-06",
  "first_page_order": 831,
  "last_page_order": 831
}
