{
  "id": 12210464,
  "name": "The North Carolina State Bar v. Robert L. Scott, Attorney",
  "name_abbreviation": "North Carolina State Bar v. Scott",
  "decision_date": "2016-01-28",
  "docket_number": "250P15",
  "first_page": "682",
  "last_page": "682",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "368 N.C. 682"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 47,
    "char_count": 412,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.639,
    "sha256": "3f2f134cb4a2b4c8d406854cc24e949dfddec838a8d4fa1abeb1cff283f3e507",
    "simhash": "1:a0b421155e63a810",
    "word_count": 77
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:54:29.404016+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The North Carolina State Bar v. Robert L. Scott, Attorney"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "1. Def\u2019s Pro Se Notice of Appeal Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA14-1008)\n1.\u2014\n2. Def\u2019s Pro Se PDR Under N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-31\n2. Denied\n3. Pit\u2019s Motion to Dismiss Appeal\n3. Allowed\n4. Def\u2019s Pro Se Motion to Amend Notice of Appeal and PDR\n4. Allowed\n5. Def\u2019s Pro Se Motion to Amend the Face Page of the Printed Record in this Appeal\n5. Allowed",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "250P15\nThe North Carolina State Bar v. Robert L. Scott, Attorney"
  },
  "file_name": "0682-05",
  "first_page_order": 832,
  "last_page_order": 832
}