{
  "id": 12211166,
  "name": "State v. Sylvester Eugene Harding",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Harding",
  "decision_date": "2016-01-28",
  "docket_number": "402P11-6",
  "first_page": "687",
  "last_page": "687",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "368 N.C. 687"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 36,
    "char_count": 272,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.674,
    "sha256": "617f830af3dccee4a7d7953bb29fcc3f4f6b8ab7a18fda0a36446fa158bead75",
    "simhash": "1:82fc351782a1e990",
    "word_count": 49
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:54:29.404016+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "State v. Sylvester Eugene Harding"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "1. Def\u2019s Pro Se Notice of Appeal Based upon a Constitutional Question (COA15-148)\n1. Dismissed ex mero motu\n2. Def\u2019s Pro Se PDR Under N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-31\n2. Denied\n3. Def\u2019s Pro Se Motion to Amend Notice of Appeal and PDR\n3. Allowed",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "402P11-6\nState v. Sylvester Eugene Harding"
  },
  "file_name": "0687-04",
  "first_page_order": 837,
  "last_page_order": 837
}
