{
  "id": 12213114,
  "name": "State v. Curtis Louis Sangster",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Sangster",
  "decision_date": "2016-03-17",
  "docket_number": "084P15-3",
  "first_page": "767",
  "last_page": "767",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "368 N.C. 767"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 34,
    "char_count": 494,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.655,
    "sha256": "097f35aa4cb805768a360546c310e23791a7d733668432d6626204aa602c228e",
    "simhash": "1:086b227c82f11049",
    "word_count": 88
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:54:29.404016+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "State v. Curtis Louis Sangster"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "1. Defs Pro Se Petition for Writ of Mandamus (9 November 2015)\n1. Dismissed\n2. Defs Pro Se Petition for Writ of Mandamus (16 November 2015)\n2. Dismissed\n3. Def\u2019s Pro Se Petition for Writ of Mandamus (23 November 2015)\n3. Denied ,11/25/2015\n4. Defs Pro Se Petition for Writ of Mandamus (3 December 2015)\n4. Dismissed\n5. Defs Pro Se Petition for Writ of Prohibition\n5. Dismissed\n6. Def\u2019s Pro Se Petition for Writ of Mandamus (28 January 2016)\n6. Dismissed",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "084P15-3\nState v. Curtis Louis Sangster"
  },
  "file_name": "0767-07",
  "first_page_order": 917,
  "last_page_order": 917
}