{
  "id": 12213960,
  "name": "State v. Charles Everette Hinton",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Hinton",
  "decision_date": "2016-03-17",
  "docket_number": "449P11-13",
  "first_page": "774",
  "last_page": "774",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "368 N.C. 774"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 53,
    "char_count": 564,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.679,
    "sha256": "8ebe3044c8ec4ed3c55d357fc5c68b9f111edfd83f02c65173c7811b09d36b65",
    "simhash": "1:3f9252cd18bb7d94",
    "word_count": 91
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:54:29.404016+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "State v. Charles Everette Hinton"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "1. Petitioner\u2019s Pro Se Motion to Take Judicial Notice of Adjudicative Facts\n1. 2. Petitioner\u2019s Pro Se Motion for\nNecessary Joinder of Parties\n2.\n3. Petitioner\u2019s Pro Se Motion for Joinder of Claims and Remedies\n3.\n4. Petitioner\u2019s Pro Se Motion for Evidentiary Oral Hearing and Findings and Conclusions by the Court\n4.\n6. Petitioner\u2019s Pro Se Motion for Inquiry into Restraint on Liberty; Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus-, Relief from Judgments\n6. Denied 02/19/2016\n6. Petitioner\u2019s Pro Se Motion for Calendaring Cause\n6.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "449P11-13\nState v. Charles Everette Hinton"
  },
  "file_name": "0774-04",
  "first_page_order": 924,
  "last_page_order": 924
}