{
  "id": 12215565,
  "name": "Dora P. Bullock v. Adam Hopler, Hopler & Wilms, LLP",
  "name_abbreviation": "Bullock v. Hopler",
  "decision_date": "2016-06-09",
  "docket_number": "089P16",
  "first_page": "914",
  "last_page": "914",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "368 N.C. 914"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 33,
    "char_count": 220,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.583,
    "sha256": "3f7a6a6ec9f3a20f5e059d2475a0f34a5d8662147b3921eeb89403b4644d06b4",
    "simhash": "1:d298973e0ea3a8d0",
    "word_count": 39
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:54:29.404016+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Dora P. Bullock v. Adam Hopler, Hopler & Wilms, LLP"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "1. Plt\u2019s Pro Se Notice of Appeal Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA15-537)\n1. Dismissed ex mero motu\n2. Plt\u2019s Pro Se PDR Under N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-31\n2. Denied",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "089P16\nDora P. Bullock v. Adam Hopler, Hopler & Wilms, LLP"
  },
  "file_name": "0914-03",
  "first_page_order": 1064,
  "last_page_order": 1064
}