{
  "id": 12215580,
  "name": "Victor Howard v. Patricia E. Chambers; Mattocks Enterprises, Inc.; Steve N. Mattocks, Individually; Jason L. Panciera, Individually; and Cawthome, Moss & Panciera, P.C.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Howard v. Chambers",
  "decision_date": "2016-06-09",
  "docket_number": "090A16",
  "first_page": "914",
  "last_page": "914",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "368 N.C. 914"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 36,
    "char_count": 278,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.611,
    "sha256": "d4a540a231d4f79a556ea58a669a19d9321dfd5a15a902de308125bb1fb4e976",
    "simhash": "1:b478d34482a3eccc",
    "word_count": 39
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:54:29.404016+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Victor Howard v. Patricia E. Chambers; Mattocks Enterprises, Inc.; Steve N. Mattocks, Individually; Jason L. Panciera, Individually; and Cawthome, Moss & Panciera, P.C."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Plt\u2019s Pro Se Notice of Appeal Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA15-590)\nDismissed ex mero motu",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "090A16\nVictor Howard v. Patricia E. Chambers; Mattocks Enterprises, Inc.; Steve N. Mattocks, Individually; Jason L. Panciera, Individually; and Cawthome, Moss & Panciera, P.C."
  },
  "file_name": "0914-04",
  "first_page_order": 1064,
  "last_page_order": 1064
}