{
  "id": 12216658,
  "name": "State v. Timothy Allen Foxworth",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Foxworth",
  "decision_date": "2016-06-09",
  "docket_number": "188P16",
  "first_page": "922",
  "last_page": "922",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "368 N.C. 922"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 46,
    "char_count": 360,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.663,
    "sha256": "039a16fd928f26dabe9b78fddcd7fac2306c9e3350f3e774e47866e4442e878c",
    "simhash": "1:30b8311402f9ad9c",
    "word_count": 64
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:54:29.404016+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "State v. Timothy Allen Foxworth"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "1. Def\u2019s Pro Se Notice of Appeal Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA15-1092)\n1. Dismissed\n2. Def\u2019s Pro Se PDR Under N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-31\n2. Denied\n3. Def\u2019s Pro Se Petition for Writ of Certiorari to Review Decision of COA\n3. Denied\n4. Def\u2019s Pro Se Motion for Subpoena Duces Tecum\n4. Dismissed as moot\nErvin, J.,\nrecused",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Ervin, J.,"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "188P16\nState v. Timothy Allen Foxworth"
  },
  "file_name": "0922-04",
  "first_page_order": 1072,
  "last_page_order": 1072
}