{
  "id": 12217265,
  "name": "State v. Charles Everette Hinton",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Hinton",
  "decision_date": "2016-06-09",
  "docket_number": "449P11-13",
  "first_page": "928",
  "last_page": "928",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "368 N.C. 928"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 58,
    "char_count": 633,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.671,
    "sha256": "5ef96f34424415a6d0e44811fc2d67af405af736b4035fc962db727077b8b9bc",
    "simhash": "1:3d9352cd10abdc95",
    "word_count": 99
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:54:29.404016+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "State v. Charles Everette Hinton"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "1. Petitioner\u2019s Pro Se Motion to Take Judicial Notice of Adjudicative Facts\n1. Dismissed\n2. Petitioner\u2019s Pro Se Motion for Necessary Joinder of Parties\n2. Dismissed\n3. Petitioner\u2019s Pro Se Motion for Joinder of Claims and Remedies\n3. Dismissed\n4. Petitioner\u2019s Pro Se Motion for Evidentiary Oral Hearing and Findings and Conclusions by the Court\n4. Dismissed\n5. Petitioner\u2019s Pro Se Motion for Inquiry into Restraints on Liberty; Petition for Writ of Habeas Coitus; Relief from Judgments\n5. Denied 02/19/2016\n6. Petitioner\u2019s Pro Se Motion for Calendaring Cause\n6. Dismissed\nErvin, J.,\nrecused",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Ervin, J.,"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "449P11-13\nState v. Charles Everette Hinton"
  },
  "file_name": "0928-03",
  "first_page_order": 1078,
  "last_page_order": 1078
}