{
  "id": 12420844,
  "name": "State v. Bobby Ray Grady",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Grady",
  "decision_date": "2016-08-18",
  "docket_number": "249P11-5",
  "first_page": "43",
  "last_page": "43",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "369 N.C. 43"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 43,
    "char_count": 304,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.698,
    "sha256": "c3de8304d7a260fe50d1ccdaa1dd977849ece17a2fa0eb6e4dbff5275cccd920",
    "simhash": "1:a2b8f516a221e000",
    "word_count": 53
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:48:28.411797+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2018-10-24",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "State v. Bobby Ray Grady"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "1. Def\u2019s Pro Se Notice of Appeal Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA15-433)\n2. Def\u2019s Pro Se PDR Under N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-31\n3. Def\u2019s Pro Se Motion to Procure Documents and Transcripts at the Government\u2019s Expense\n1. Dismissed ex mero motu\n2. Denied\n3. Dismissed as moot",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "249P11-5\nState v. Bobby Ray Grady"
  },
  "file_name": "0043-03",
  "first_page_order": 119,
  "last_page_order": 119
}