{
  "id": 12421830,
  "name": "State v. Damario Montreal Coxton",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Coxton",
  "decision_date": "2016-12-08",
  "docket_number": "121P16-2",
  "first_page": "182",
  "last_page": "182",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "369 N.C. 182"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 48,
    "char_count": 350,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.56,
    "sha256": "8025d28b8835dad84d5155e278fbf55912db40fae5617a64d1ef5b8361b535da",
    "simhash": "1:b2b5091454eda011",
    "word_count": 60
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:48:28.411797+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2018-10-24",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "State v. Damario Montreal Coxton"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "1. Def\u2019s Notice of Appeal Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA15-575-2)\n2. Def\u2019s PDR Under N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-31\n3. Def\u2019s Motion to Deem PDR Timely Filed\n4. Def\u2019s Petition in the Alternative for Writ of Certiorari to Review Decision of COA\n1. Dismissed ex mero motu\n2. Denied\n3. Allowed\n4. Dismissed as moot",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "121P16-2\nState v. Damario Montreal Coxton"
  },
  "file_name": "0182-11",
  "first_page_order": 258,
  "last_page_order": 258
}