{
  "id": 12422314,
  "name": "Linwood Wilson v. Joe Curtis",
  "name_abbreviation": "Wilson v. Curtis",
  "decision_date": "2016-12-08",
  "docket_number": "371P16",
  "first_page": "195",
  "last_page": "195",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "369 N.C. 195"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 32,
    "char_count": 258,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.619,
    "sha256": "f58433b26212b390db4ec81a50e17d1e5ebcd01452b9dc8c60ca0486db025dc6",
    "simhash": "1:b2f815960ab3a0f3",
    "word_count": 47
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:48:28.411797+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2018-10-24",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Linwood Wilson v. Joe Curtis"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "1. Pit\u2019s Pro Se Notice of Appeal Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA16-194)\n2. Pit\u2019s Pro Se PDR Under N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-31\n3. Pit\u2019s Pro Se Amended PDR Under N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-31\n1. Dismissed ex mero motu\n2. Denied\n3. Denied",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "371P16\nLinwood Wilson v. Joe Curtis"
  },
  "file_name": "0195-05",
  "first_page_order": 271,
  "last_page_order": 271
}