{
  "id": 12423428,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JESUS MARTINEZ",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Martinez",
  "decision_date": "2017-03-16",
  "docket_number": "No. 25P17",
  "first_page": "520",
  "last_page": "520",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "369 N.C. 520"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "742 S.E.2d 798",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 2013,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "366 N.C. 548",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        4345771
      ],
      "year": 2013,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/366/0548-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "730 S.E.2d 193",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 2012,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "222 N.C. App. 160",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        4033026
      ],
      "year": 2012,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/222/0160-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 91,
    "char_count": 987,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.721,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.25626474748141687
    },
    "sha256": "964ddca00f4561b8ce2db3756795b43c8579885a716f5e1390f5d653175fa8c2",
    "simhash": "1:3c6980328e7566d6",
    "word_count": 168
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:48:28.411797+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2018-10-24",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JESUS MARTINEZ"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "ORDER\nUpon consideration of the Petition for Discretionary Review filed by the State of North Carolina on 19 January 2017, the Court enters the following order:\n\u201cThe Court allows the State\u2019s Petition for Discretionary Review for the limited purpose of remanding this case to the Court of Appeals for the purpose of determining whether the trial court\u2019s instruction held to have been erroneous by the Court of Appeals constituted plain error as required by State v. Boyd, 222 N.C. App. 160, 730 S.E.2d 193 (2012), rev\u2019d for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, 366 N.C. 548, 742 S.E.2d 798 (2013).\u201d\nBy order of the Court, this the 16th day of March, 2017.\ns/Morgan. J.\nFor the Court\nWITNESS my hand and the seal of the Supreme Court of North Carolina, this the 17th day of March, 2017.\nJ. BRYAN BOYD Clerk, Supreme Court of North Carolina\ns/M.C. Hackney Assistant Clerk, Supreme Court of North Carolina",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "s/Morgan. J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JESUS MARTINEZ\nFrom Mecklenburg County\nNo. 25P17"
  },
  "file_name": "0520-01",
  "first_page_order": 596,
  "last_page_order": 596
}